Thursday, July 07, 2011

G+ impressions mine

With the help of a few friends, I somehow slipped through this narrow window into Google Plus (my G+ profile, which has lost its vanity URL for the moment) ...

Google+ For Businesses Coming Later This Year -- InformationWeek

... Google+, the company's recently introduced set of social communication services, briefly opened to new participants last night, between about 7pm PDT and 9:40pm PDT. Google engineering director David Besbris, in a Google+ post, said that the Google+ field trial is going well and that Google is seeking to double the undisclosed size of the field trial...

It's good. After Wave and Buzz failed, and Google Reader Share succeeded but got no love, G+ works. So far Streams is a smarter, better, version of Facebook personal Pages (no corporate/org/group equivalents, however). I don't think it's more complex that Facebook; FB at best is only transiently comprehensible. As soon as I figure it out, the rules change.

FB's constant attempts to hack their own customers has pissed off so many users, including my wife, that G+ has a pretty good chance to compete. At the very least, it should own the Android demographic. Whether iG+ gets the iPhone crowd or not depends on the shaky state of the Apple-Google detente. At the very least, G+ strengthens Apple's hand with both FB and Twitter.

Some quick impressions of my own ...

  • I'm looking forward to the day when Google moves Google Reader Shares/Notes into the Streams framework, closes Buzz, and makes Streams/Sparks the "comment" framework for Google Blogs. Until then G+ will be fun to play with, after that I'll be spending a lot of time with it.
  • Safari is showing page errors with G+. Unsurprisingly Chrome works best.
  • It will be interesting to see how I manage the John Gordon/John F identity clash in G+. I think I should be able to make it work.
  • Google Data Liberation has its own home on my post G+ Accounts page. It includes all Picasa web albums, my profile, my stream, by Buzz data and all circles and contacts. Very impressive.
  • Profile settings says I can control which circles see parts of my Profile, but that's not working for me yet.
  • The Privacy page is excellent.
  • My Google Profile vanity URL now redirects to a G+ Profile with my old 1138 .... Google ID showing.

Of the coverage I've read, I like these best ...

4 comments:

Martin said...

Have you already tested the new Blogger.com layout?

It will be interesting to see how I manage the John Gordon/John F identity clash in G+. I think I should be able to make it work.

Two profiles?

Profile settings says I can control which circles see parts of my Profile, but that's not working for me yet.

It's working for me. There's now an other problem, however: Before Google+, my public Google profile showed my 'About' page by default. Now with Google+, my empty 'Posts' page is shown. It's empty because I haven't created public posts so far.

My Google Profile vanity URL now redirects to a G+ Profile with my old 1138 .... Google ID showing.

Probably a step against vanity URL envy … I'm FirstnameLastname2 at XING and not very happy about my resulting 'vanity' URL.

Redirecting the old vanity URLs is already a progress, BTW. Right after the start of Google+, only URLs with IDs worked.

JGF said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
JGF said...

Martin,

Blogger categorized your comment as "spam"! That was bloody weird, not seen that before. Coincidentally happened just as they transitioned my draft.blogger.com to the new infrastructure (yesterday).

I wonder if something is broken.

Can you ping me on G+ btw, I think I've lost your connection.

I was a bit surprised I didn't get into G+ on my first try. I wonder if my Profile vanity URL had something to do with it -- if they wanted to get the redirect working first.

Martin said...

Thanks for fishing out my comment from the spam folder. It would a surprise, of course, if the transition of millions of users to a new infrastructure worked without any problems.

My Gmail (Google Apps Mail actually) spam filters isn't reliable either. I started to check my spam folder daily after I had discovered that false positives were more common than I had thought.

P.S.: I shared a 'radio check' post on Google+.