It took me a day to realize that this comment on Gordon's Notes: Apologetics: God and the Fermi Paradox was a spam comment (Spomment):
Luke said... Interesting questions you ask - as always enjoy reading your posts. We all have our personal experiences & beliefs, but I do have to challenge you to check out an event coming up in the spring that I recently was introduced to. March 12, 2011 a simulcast called The Case for Christianity is taking place that will address the very question you have asked. Led by Lee Strobel (former Legal Editor of the Chicago Tribune) & Mark Mittelberg, all of the most avoided questions Christians don't like to answer or even discuss. Both are authors of extremely intriguing books, I encourage you to check them out as well as the simulcast in March. Definitely worth the time & worthy of the debate! Thanks again!
It's obvious in retrospect "interesting questions you ask" is a give away. It doesn't address any specific aspect of my post, and it leads directly into an event promotion.
Still, it snuck under my radar -- and Google's too. It's well constructed.
Of course the construction was human, only the targeting was algorithmic. It's a bit of a milestone though -- it's almost a relevant comment.
Charles Stross and others have speculated that spambot wars will spawn hard AI. First, though, they have to become specific, relevant, and constructive. We're getting closer ...
Incidentally, shame on Strobel and Mittelberg for using this kind of sleazoid marketing.
See also:
- Gordon's Notes: Slouching towards Skynet (2007)
- Gordon's Notes: The evolution of comment spam - from parasite to symbiote? (2009)
- Gordon's Notes: Phishing with the post-Turing avatar (2010)
- xkcd: Suspicion: Spambot love
- xkcd: Constructive (2010 - when spambots rule)
No comments:
Post a Comment