I don't remember which book, but I remember Gingrich claimed he'd finished it in a few days of easy reading. Given Gingrich's historical record he's either the world's smartest fool or a master of bull poop. Modern physics books are a hard slog for the non-genius, non-physicist. I've read a few of them, and I'm always impressed by how much work it is to integrate the concept space, and how insane the working scientist authors are to write these complex tomes.
Why, for example, did Sean M. Carroll , write From Eternity to Here? The guys an untentured Caltech theoretical physicist -- he's supposed to be cranking out grants and papers. I mean, I love the book, but this isn't survival behavior. His blogging is sinful enough, but the book is another level.
Part of the reason might be getting some of his personal theories more attention. Carroll believes cosmological inflation, while "true", simply "begs the question". That is, while cosmological inflation explains some properties of the observable cosmos, it raises even more questions about the state of the pre-inflationary cosmos. Carroll believes the physics of entropy is a possible key to that puzzle. In today's physics community this seems to be mildly heretical and probably not a great way to get tenure. 
So frustration with the establishment is probably a part of his compulsion, but it's not all. There's a clue to the rest buried in the footnotes  ...
273. What would be even better is if some young person read this book, became convinced this was a serious problem worthy of our attention, and went on to solve it.... if you end up finding an explanation for the arrow of time that becomes widely accepted within the physics community, please let me know if this book had anything to do with it.
The work of puzzle solving goes on, from one mortal generation to the next. That's our little way of poking a stick in the Eye of Entropy.
 The unrelated Sean B. Carroll is another working scientist author of popular biology books.
 Consecutively numbered - brilliant. Wish everyone did this instead of renumbering each chapter. After reading the core book, go back and read the footnotes. I made the mistake of borrowing this book from the library -- and blowing through multiple renewal periods and fines and so on. Finally, with 30 pages to go, I gave up and bought the sucker. If Carroll ever does another edition though, he ought to include a concept glossary as well.
 Most serious books of lay physics, including Greene's work, has this element. Like Greene and other working physicists, Carroll sticks with establishment physics for 90% of the book, then lays out his own ideas with clear warnings that "dragons are here". It's a good practice and it's part of what distinguishes books by reality-based physicists from the flaky side of the cosmos. Of course in modern physics "reality" is profoundly unreal.
- BBC IOT - Theories of Everything With Brian Greene 9/2007
- Mathematical universe: the softly spoken premise of string theory 1/2008
- Carroll on Time: emergent or fundamental? 9/2011
- Entanglement and the realness of time 8/2011
- Sean Carroll: Blog Posts - Carroll's favorites
- Cosmic Variance's Sean Carroll on the arrow of time 6/2007
- Inflation isn't what it used to be (cosmologic version) 10/2011
- A quantum state eternally evolving in an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space 11/2008