Macworld | Live Update: Apple’s Notebook Event
No USB 3 anywhere, no firewire on the MacBook.
Maybe the GPU will help Aperture.
Ho hum.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Why Twitter?
One aspect of being a wizened mid-western geek is that I have to figure out the why of tech on my own. On most new tech I'm second wave, but out here that means I'm ahead of my peers. I was first to Alta Vista, first to Google, etc.
It's kind of like skiing. An intermediate western skier is an expert here. (Though we have, strangely, a number of Minnesota trained Olympic skiers.)
So, for example, in July of 2005 I thought podcasts were an odd idea. That was before I experience In Our Time and figured out why I wanted them. (Though that's the only podcast I listen to -- I don't have that much audio time in my life. So if they went I'd probably still have only a single podcast capacity.)
Now, after ignoring it for over a year, I decided, while visiting my parents, to try to figure out the Why of my Twitter account.
I will now pass on my speculative interpretation to my fellow wizened geeks. Corrections through comments are welcome.
Wizened geeks do not grok SMS. That's important, because Twitter is the mongrel child of SMS and RSS.
All true geeks of every age adore RSS (subscription/feed more properly), so that part of Twitter's parentage is fine. It may also be a recent addition, which kind of breaks the parental analogy.
It's the SMS part that's weird for us.
We do not grok SMS because we're too old for the primary SMS function -- socializing and mating. We have way too many social demands to want more. We are also aesthetically repulsed by how the 255 character SMS hack became a font of phone company revenue, thus incenting them to block better, less spammy, alternatives.
For those who use SMS though, the key to twitter is you can SMS your 256 character message ("tweet") to Twitter from even the crummiest mobile phone. No iPhone, gPhone or Smart phone needed. SMS is a lowest common denominator standard.
Traditionally, I suspect, the "tweets" were broadcast to "followers" (subscribers) who read them as SMS messages on their phone.
So in this incarnation Twitter acted like a broadcasting hub for SMS messages where recipients signed up for SMS notifications.
Blech. Who needs more interruptions?
But Twitter also has feeds (example), and an API. That's much more interesting.
So it's possible to have a dedicated iPhone client for sending and receiving 'tweets', and activity can also be tracked through feed consumers like Google Reader (web and mobile), OS X Mail.app, embedded iGoogle feed gadgets, Outlook 2007 (worst possible reader), iPhone feed clients, Yahoo Pipes, and so on.
Once the iPhone finally (was supposed to happen last month) gets a notification management service then we can dispense with the SMS ugliness. We will be able to create tweets through the API and subscribe through feed readers.
True, there's no security -- but that's a feature. No security means it's very easy to set up connections. Just don't Tweet anything you don't want the world to know.
So if I'm leaving the office I can 'tweet' that, and Emily can pick it up if she's interested. Otherwise it goes away.
Twitter with SMS is for the young. Twitter without SMS -- that's interesting even to the aged sage.
It's kind of like skiing. An intermediate western skier is an expert here. (Though we have, strangely, a number of Minnesota trained Olympic skiers.)
So, for example, in July of 2005 I thought podcasts were an odd idea. That was before I experience In Our Time and figured out why I wanted them. (Though that's the only podcast I listen to -- I don't have that much audio time in my life. So if they went I'd probably still have only a single podcast capacity.)
Now, after ignoring it for over a year, I decided, while visiting my parents, to try to figure out the Why of my Twitter account.
I will now pass on my speculative interpretation to my fellow wizened geeks. Corrections through comments are welcome.
Wizened geeks do not grok SMS. That's important, because Twitter is the mongrel child of SMS and RSS.
All true geeks of every age adore RSS (subscription/feed more properly), so that part of Twitter's parentage is fine. It may also be a recent addition, which kind of breaks the parental analogy.
It's the SMS part that's weird for us.
We do not grok SMS because we're too old for the primary SMS function -- socializing and mating. We have way too many social demands to want more. We are also aesthetically repulsed by how the 255 character SMS hack became a font of phone company revenue, thus incenting them to block better, less spammy, alternatives.
For those who use SMS though, the key to twitter is you can SMS your 256 character message ("tweet") to Twitter from even the crummiest mobile phone. No iPhone, gPhone or Smart phone needed. SMS is a lowest common denominator standard.
Traditionally, I suspect, the "tweets" were broadcast to "followers" (subscribers) who read them as SMS messages on their phone.
So in this incarnation Twitter acted like a broadcasting hub for SMS messages where recipients signed up for SMS notifications.
Blech. Who needs more interruptions?
But Twitter also has feeds (example), and an API. That's much more interesting.
So it's possible to have a dedicated iPhone client for sending and receiving 'tweets', and activity can also be tracked through feed consumers like Google Reader (web and mobile), OS X Mail.app, embedded iGoogle feed gadgets, Outlook 2007 (worst possible reader), iPhone feed clients, Yahoo Pipes, and so on.
Once the iPhone finally (was supposed to happen last month) gets a notification management service then we can dispense with the SMS ugliness. We will be able to create tweets through the API and subscribe through feed readers.
True, there's no security -- but that's a feature. No security means it's very easy to set up connections. Just don't Tweet anything you don't want the world to know.
So if I'm leaving the office I can 'tweet' that, and Emily can pick it up if she's interested. Otherwise it goes away.
Twitter with SMS is for the young. Twitter without SMS -- that's interesting even to the aged sage.
Andy Martin: ally of the Right, FOX TV guest, anti-semite loon
Andy Martin specializes in generating lies about Obama that the Right likes to hear - and repeat.
FOX TV, in particular, has been a great repeater. Palin/McCain have played on those lies when it served them. Their supporters scream them aloud; they believe what they see on FOX TV and hear on talk radio.
Today the NYT tells us where the lies come from. They also expose FOX TV for what it is -- a curse upon America and an enemy of the enlightenment. Emphases mine.
So Martin, Corsi, and Sampley are Obama's enemies. I think that's reason alone to support Obama.
The great irony of course, is that the ravings of a pro-Holocaust anti-semite should find a credulous audience with some American Jews. I'm hoping this superb NYT article will help with that particular problem.
FOX TV, in particular, has been a great repeater. Palin/McCain have played on those lies when it served them. Their supporters scream them aloud; they believe what they see on FOX TV and hear on talk radio.
Today the NYT tells us where the lies come from. They also expose FOX TV for what it is -- a curse upon America and an enemy of the enlightenment. Emphases mine.
The Man Behind the Whispers About Obama - NYTimes.comMr. Martin has been a darling of the whacko Right, but politically he's an anti-semitic loon. He in turn inspired Mr. Corsi, who became wealthy writing a book of lies popular with the Right. Sampley, another talk radio favorite, keys off Martin as well.
October 13, 2008
By JIM RUTENBERG
... an appearance in a documentary-style program on the Fox News Channel watched by three million people last week thrust the man, Andy Martin, and his past into the foreground. The program allowed Mr. Martin to assert falsely and without challenge that Mr. Obama had once trained to overthrow the government.
An examination of legal documents and election filings, along with interviews with his acquaintances, revealed Mr. Martin, 62, to be a man with a history of scintillating if not always factual claims. He has left a trail of animosity — some of it provoked by anti-Jewish comments — among political leaders, lawyers and judges in three states over more than 30 years.
He is a law school graduate, but his admission to the Illinois bar was blocked in the 1970s after a psychiatric finding of “moderately severe character defect manifested by well-documented ideation with a paranoid flavor and a grandiose character.”
Though he is not a lawyer, Mr. Martin went on to become a prodigious filer of lawsuits, and he made unsuccessful attempts to win public office for both parties in three states, as well as for president at least twice, in 1988 and 2000. Based in Chicago, he now identifies himself as a writer who focuses on his anti-Obama Web site and press releases.
... The CBS News program "48 Hours" in 1993 devoted an hourlong program, "See You in Court; Civil War, Anthony Martin Clogs Legal System with Frivolous Lawsuits," to what it called his prolific filings. (Mr. Martin has also been known as Anthony Martin-Trigona.) He has filed so many lawsuits that a judge barred him from doing so in any federal court without preliminary approval.
He prepared to run as a Democrat for Congress in Connecticut, where paperwork for one of his campaign committees listed as one purpose “to exterminate Jew power.” He ran as a Republican for the Florida State Senate and the United States Senate in Illinois. When running for president in 1999, he aired a television advertisement in New Hampshire that accused George W. Bush of using cocaine.
In the 1990s, Mr. Martin was jailed in a case in Florida involving a physical altercation....
...Theories about Mr. Obama’s background have taken on a life of their own. But independent analysts seeking the origins of the cyberspace attacks wind up at Mr. Martin’s first press release, posted on the Free Republic Web site in August 2004.
Its general outlines have turned up in a host of works that have expounded falsely on Mr. Obama’s heritage or supposed attempts to conceal it, including “Obama Nation,” the widely discredited best seller about Mr. Obama by Jerome R. Corsi. Mr. Corsi opens the book with a quote from Mr. Martin...
... Ms. Allen said Mr. Martin’s original work found amplification in 2006, when a man named Ted Sampley wrote an article painting Mr. Obama as a secret practitioner of Islam...
Mr. Sampley, coincidentally, is a Vietnam veteran and longtime opponent of Mr. McCain and Senator John Kerry... Speaking of Mr. Martin’s influence on his Obama writings, Mr. Sampley said, “I keyed off of his work.”
Mr. Martin’s depictions of Mr. Obama as a secret Muslim have found resonance among some Jewish voters who have received e-mail messages containing various versions of his initial theory, often by new authors and with new twists...
... Yet in various court papers, Mr. Martin had impugned Jews.
A motion he filed in a 1983 bankruptcy case called the judge “a crooked, slimy Jew who has a history of lying and thieving common to members of his race.”
In another motion, filed in 1983, Mr. Martin wrote, “I am able to understand how the Holocaust took place, and with every passing day feel less and less sorry that it did.”
In an interview, Mr. Martin denied some statements against Jews attributed to him in court papers, blaming malicious judges for inserting them.
But in his “48 Hours” interview in 1993, he affirmed a different anti-Semitic part of the affidavit that included the line about the Holocaust, saying, “The record speaks for itself.”
When asked Friday about an assertion in his court papers that “Jews, historically and in daily living, act through clans and in wolf pack syndrome,” he said, “That one sort of rings a bell.”...
So Martin, Corsi, and Sampley are Obama's enemies. I think that's reason alone to support Obama.
The great irony of course, is that the ravings of a pro-Holocaust anti-semite should find a credulous audience with some American Jews. I'm hoping this superb NYT article will help with that particular problem.
Monday, October 13, 2008
NYT Bear Market Comparison
Terrific graphic: How This Bear Market Compares - NYTimes.com. We're 50% percent below the 2000 high and falling faster than the Great Depression crash. On the other hand, we're only half-way to the doom 1932.
I had no idea the market was so bad in 1942.
The great bear markets have been:
Very long expansions from 74 to 87 and then 87 to 2000.
I had no idea the market was so bad in 1942.
The great bear markets have been:
- 1929-32: the current champ
- 1937-42
- 1946-49
- 1968-70
- 1972-74 (I remember the 70s. Bloody awful but 74 was a fabulous time to buy stocks.)
- 1987: almost the steepest crash, super fast recovery
- 2000-02 (the dot com crash)
- 2008: a contender
Very long expansions from 74 to 87 and then 87 to 2000.
My Nobel prize in economics
Well, technically it was earned by Professor Paul Krugman, better known as the man who drives the Right lividly insane ...
I've been a fan ofPaul's Dr. Krugman's editorials for years. Brad DeLong sometimes reads my blog, and Paul reads Brad's blog. I've left comments on Krugman's blog and I'm sure he's found them very enlightening. So that must be worth oh, say, a picogram of the Medal.
More, Paul is a leader of my political tribe, the tribe of people who respect the market but who don't worship the market, the tribe for whom the weak matter for reasons of value and self-preservation alike. Picogram number two.
Ergo, My Nobel.
At last.
Congratulations Dr. Krugman and thank you Sweden.
Now, how do you turn this to Barack's advantage? Oh, and save the world too?
Paul Krugman Wins Economics Nobel - Economix Blog - NYTimes.comStill. I feel I have a claim of sorts.
.... It’s been an extremely weird day, but weird in a positive way,” Mr. Krugman said in an interview on his way to a Washington meeting for the Group of Thirty, an international body from the public and private sectors that discusses international economics. He said he was mostly “preoccupied with the hassles” of trying to make all his scheduled meetings today and answer a constantly-ringing cell phone...
I've been a fan of
More, Paul is a leader of my political tribe, the tribe of people who respect the market but who don't worship the market, the tribe for whom the weak matter for reasons of value and self-preservation alike. Picogram number two.
Ergo, My Nobel.
At last.
Congratulations Dr. Krugman and thank you Sweden.
Now, how do you turn this to Barack's advantage? Oh, and save the world too?
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Justified American pride: The ADA
Every time I visit my disabled mother, I'm reminded that the US is not entirely Canada's uncivilized step-sister.
Yes, there's the small detail of universal health care in Canada. That counts for a lot of civilization points.
On the other hand, we have the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. It may annoy the geeks who write on Wikipedia, but, as imperfect as it is, it is an act of civilization.
In the US airports, hotels and most business facilities are accessible. In Canada, you're on your own -- and it ain't pretty.
The ADA was signed by George H. W. Bush. In retrospect he wasn't so bad - compared, say, to his son. I despised his rhetoric, but his actions were often better than his words.
Yes, there's the small detail of universal health care in Canada. That counts for a lot of civilization points.
On the other hand, we have the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. It may annoy the geeks who write on Wikipedia, but, as imperfect as it is, it is an act of civilization.
In the US airports, hotels and most business facilities are accessible. In Canada, you're on your own -- and it ain't pretty.
The ADA was signed by George H. W. Bush. In retrospect he wasn't so bad - compared, say, to his son. I despised his rhetoric, but his actions were often better than his words.
Saturday, October 11, 2008
The cost of havoc has been falling for a long time ...
I still wonder what will happen when bio-weapons are available to every heartbroken adolescent male.
On the other hand, people have noted the falling cost of havoc before ...
We're still around. I don't understand how that's possible given all the close calls of the cold war, but it seems to be true.
Great post.
On the other hand, people have noted the falling cost of havoc before ...
Schneier on Security: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the SameFollow the link for context.
... Murderous organizations have increased in size and scope; they are more daring, they are served by the most terrible weapons offered by modern science, and the world is nowadays threatened by new forces which, if recklessly unchained, may some day wreck universal destruction....
We're still around. I don't understand how that's possible given all the close calls of the cold war, but it seems to be true.
Great post.
Palin's Pegler connection
Good for Frank Rich. Haven't seen this noted elsewhere.
I wonder if they know that in Florida.
Op-Ed Columnist - The Terrorist Barack Hussein Obama - NYTimes.comSo Palin is a Pegler admirer?
.... No less disconcerting was a still-unexplained passage of Palin’s convention speech: Her use of an unattributed quote praising small-town America (as opposed to, say, Chicago and its community organizers) from Westbrook Pegler, the mid-century Hearst columnist famous for his anti-Semitism, racism and violent rhetorical excess. After an assassin tried to kill F.D.R. at a Florida rally and murdered Chicago’s mayor instead in 1933, Pegler wrote that it was “regrettable that Giuseppe Zangara shot the wrong man.” In the ’60s, Pegler had a wish for Bobby Kennedy: “Some white patriot of the Southern tier will spatter his spoonful of brains in public premises before the snow falls.”
This is the writer who found his way into a speech by a potential vice president at a national political convention. It’s astonishing there’s been no demand for a public accounting from the McCain campaign. Imagine if Obama had quoted a Black Panther or Louis Farrakhan — or William Ayers — in Denver....
I wonder if they know that in Florida.
Christopher Buckley's Obama endorsement and some good news for a change
Christopher Buckley writes the back page of the National Review.
He ain't a guy I'd normally read, but the wonders of the net sent me to his Obama endorsement: Sorry, Dad, I'm Voting for Obama - The Daily Beast.
It's good. Turns out he's a small government conservative and social libertarian. Who knew? I don't agree with those values (who shall care for the weak?), but I can work with 'em.
Buckley has been a McCain supporter for many years, but the Palin affair and McCain's courting of the fringe has broken him. He read Obama's books, and he switched.
So why doesn't he write this in the National Review?
That's an interesting story.
Turns out a fellow NR journalist wrote recently turned on SarahPeron Palin. She started receiving Paul Krugman type email -- 12,000 hate messages from the loons of the right.
Buckley thinks he can dodge the hate mail. Maybe he can, those NR readers are pretty dim. They probably won't find his announcement.
So another moderate Republican has decided Palin/McCain is cracked, and Obama (remember how he praised Reagan? He's damned good.) is a remarkable man. That's good news, and a sign that the GOP has a reform constituency. We really need a strong, healthy, non-whacko GOP, so that's good.
There's more good news. McCain ran into some loons from my home state (Lakeville Minnesota, a growing exurban community with plummeting real estate values -- so lots of fear) at one of his rallies. He had a run in with one of the audience and ended up defending Obama and repudiating his own advertising campaign.
That would be mildly good news if it meant McCain had some vestiges of honor left [1], but there's better news than that.
The GOP's hate campaign, so far, isn't working as expected. Palin/McCain's disapproval rates are rising. The hate mobs are making the media nervous. Maybe the money people are starting to think what would happen if one of McCain's lunatics penetrated Obama's security perimeter. Whatever, the GOP is retracting.
So American's are not quite as susceptible to pure hate strategies as I'd thought. That's good.
So do I think Obama will win?
No.
All McCain has to do is play nice and beat on Palin a bit. Tone things down a tad, but run the same attacks in a stealthier manner. The media will fall over itself with relief that the "real McCain" is back. The GOP can then let the attacks simmer at a lower level.
So I still think McCain will win, Palin will become President, and America will shuffle off into the history books.
I confess, though, that Obama is doing better than I'd imagined. I feel good about the money we send him.
So here's the last bit of good news.
Obama is very good at this game. He knows what McCain and the GOP will do next. He'll be ready.
If anyone can get us out of this trap, it's Barack.
[1] The consensus is that McCain has been getting an earful from GOP moderates and donors. Personally, I wonder if his staff has been getting complaints from the Secret Service. They are, after all, protecting Obama from the loons.
He ain't a guy I'd normally read, but the wonders of the net sent me to his Obama endorsement: Sorry, Dad, I'm Voting for Obama - The Daily Beast.
It's good. Turns out he's a small government conservative and social libertarian. Who knew? I don't agree with those values (who shall care for the weak?), but I can work with 'em.
Buckley has been a McCain supporter for many years, but the Palin affair and McCain's courting of the fringe has broken him. He read Obama's books, and he switched.
So why doesn't he write this in the National Review?
That's an interesting story.
Turns out a fellow NR journalist wrote recently turned on Sarah
Buckley thinks he can dodge the hate mail. Maybe he can, those NR readers are pretty dim. They probably won't find his announcement.
So another moderate Republican has decided Palin/McCain is cracked, and Obama (remember how he praised Reagan? He's damned good.) is a remarkable man. That's good news, and a sign that the GOP has a reform constituency. We really need a strong, healthy, non-whacko GOP, so that's good.
There's more good news. McCain ran into some loons from my home state (Lakeville Minnesota, a growing exurban community with plummeting real estate values -- so lots of fear) at one of his rallies. He had a run in with one of the audience and ended up defending Obama and repudiating his own advertising campaign.
That would be mildly good news if it meant McCain had some vestiges of honor left [1], but there's better news than that.
The GOP's hate campaign, so far, isn't working as expected. Palin/McCain's disapproval rates are rising. The hate mobs are making the media nervous. Maybe the money people are starting to think what would happen if one of McCain's lunatics penetrated Obama's security perimeter. Whatever, the GOP is retracting.
So American's are not quite as susceptible to pure hate strategies as I'd thought. That's good.
So do I think Obama will win?
No.
All McCain has to do is play nice and beat on Palin a bit. Tone things down a tad, but run the same attacks in a stealthier manner. The media will fall over itself with relief that the "real McCain" is back. The GOP can then let the attacks simmer at a lower level.
So I still think McCain will win, Palin will become President, and America will shuffle off into the history books.
I confess, though, that Obama is doing better than I'd imagined. I feel good about the money we send him.
So here's the last bit of good news.
Obama is very good at this game. He knows what McCain and the GOP will do next. He'll be ready.
If anyone can get us out of this trap, it's Barack.
[1] The consensus is that McCain has been getting an earful from GOP moderates and donors. Personally, I wonder if his staff has been getting complaints from the Secret Service. They are, after all, protecting Obama from the loons.
WPA2 going the way of WEP?
WEP is trivial to hack now, but WPA2 wireless encryption was doing ok. Not so much now ...
Otherwise, I don't think anyone will go this trouble to hack my home WLAN. Yet. In a few years though it will be child's play. Banks are a different story.
Time for the post-WPA2 generation.
On the other hand, sir, the Wi-Fi hackers still love us | Good Morning Silicon ValleyBe nice to the neighborhood geek. Make him mad and he'll crack your home network.
Nvidia still has at least one loyal fan base, though not one it would want to embrace — hackers (see “The Law of Unintended Consequences: a graphic example“). Seems the massively parallel processing capabilities of the graphics chips also lend themselves well to brute-force cracking, and the euphemistically named “password recovery software” sold by Russian firm Elcomsoft puts that power in the hands of the ill-intentioned masses. The latest warning of the ramifications comes from Global Secure Systems, which says the hardware-software combination renders Wi-Fi’s WPA and WPA2 encryption systems pretty much useless. Using the graphics processors, hackers can break the commonly used wireless encryption schemes 100 times faster than with conventional microprocessors, GSS officials said...
Otherwise, I don't think anyone will go this trouble to hack my home WLAN. Yet. In a few years though it will be child's play. Banks are a different story.
Time for the post-WPA2 generation.
You get what you pay for. The tragedy of the incentive plan.
Pay for performance is a big deal in American health care, though I have a hunch enthusiasm is already waning.
It won't work.
Sales guys are honorable mercenaries (I love 'em for that), but surgeons, physicians, nurses, teachers, professors, principals, and priests will all do more or less the same thing.
If you want to change behavior look at cultural reinforcement, look at changing systems to reduce error and make it easy to do the right thing, make it possible for people to privately compare their work to the mean. Work on a culture of excellence.
Don't expect incentives to do the work for you.
PS. I think Spolsky is deluding himself in his conclusion. Otherwise, a good essay.
It won't work.
for.How Hard Could It Be?: Sins of Commissions, Marketing and Advertising Article - Inc. Joel SpolskyTalk to anyone who's designed an incentive program for a sales force. Incent product A, and product B will go down the toilet. That's ok if you want to kill product B, not so great otherwise.
.... back to Austin, the Harvard professor. His point is that incentive plans based on measuring performance always backfire. Not sometimes. Always. What you measure is inevitably a proxy for the outcome you want, and even though you may think that all you have to do is tweak the incentives to boost sales, you can't. It's not going to work. Because people have brains and are endlessly creative when it comes to improving their personal well-being at everyone else's expense....
Sales guys are honorable mercenaries (I love 'em for that), but surgeons, physicians, nurses, teachers, professors, principals, and priests will all do more or less the same thing.
If you want to change behavior look at cultural reinforcement, look at changing systems to reduce error and make it easy to do the right thing, make it possible for people to privately compare their work to the mean. Work on a culture of excellence.
Don't expect incentives to do the work for you.
PS. I think Spolsky is deluding himself in his conclusion. Otherwise, a good essay.
Friday, October 10, 2008
Republicans for Obama
Some of my favorite journalists, like Paul Krugman, gave Obama a hard time for saying nice things about Reagan and the GOP.
I winced too, but I also suspected Obama had more political savvy in his little finger than Krugman or I have all over.
Now that's paying off. Moderate Republicans are deserting Palin/McCain for Obama. Former GOP Governor William Milliken, former GOP Senator Chafee. I wonder about Olympia Snowe. David Brooks is sounding like he might jump.
A few more like that and ...
Of course I still fully expect Palin/McCain to win.
I winced too, but I also suspected Obama had more political savvy in his little finger than Krugman or I have all over.
Now that's paying off. Moderate Republicans are deserting Palin/McCain for Obama. Former GOP Governor William Milliken, former GOP Senator Chafee. I wonder about Olympia Snowe. David Brooks is sounding like he might jump.
A few more like that and ...
Of course I still fully expect Palin/McCain to win.
Oh, we have a President?
Henry Blodget became infamous during a prior, relatively modest, market crash. Now he writes witty stock market analyses.
Today's ended with a surprise reminder that Bush is still around.
As long as he sticks to pointless speeches rather than, say, declaring war on Pakistan. You did know there was an undeclared war going on there, didn't you?
Today's ended with a surprise reminder that Bush is still around.
World Markets Smashed, Massive New Bailout TalksEmily says it's kind of cute that Bush is still trying. We thought he'd left for his new Dallas home.
...In other news, our leader will speak to us this morning and tell us to remain calm.
As long as he sticks to pointless speeches rather than, say, declaring war on Pakistan. You did know there was an undeclared war going on there, didn't you?
Thursday, October 09, 2008
Halamka's Clothing List - for cold weather
John Halamka, a geek's geek, has listed his cold weather clothing preferences:
Arcteryx (new to me - vancouver based, impressive looking stuff) and Outdoor Research get the glory.
Not cheap of course. I might put one or more of these on my holiday list ...
Life as a Healthcare CIO: Staying Warm in New England"Knowing" Halamka as I do, I wager this is a good list to work from. He's an ice climber and insanely geeky, you won't get better recommendations than this.
A torso base layer of thin polyester (Arcteryx Rho LT)
A torso shell layer of Gortex Pro Shell (Arcteryx Alpha LT)
A lower extremity combination of thin insulation and shell (Arcteryx Gamma MX)
A head base layer of thin polyester (OR Ninjaclava)
A warm, windproof hat (OR Windpro Hat)
A hand base layer of thin polyester (OR PL100 Gloves)
A waterproof/windproof shell layer (OR Cornice Mitts)
A belay jacket on my upper extremity when I stop moving (Arcteryx Solo)
Arcteryx (new to me - vancouver based, impressive looking stuff) and Outdoor Research get the glory.
Not cheap of course. I might put one or more of these on my holiday list ...
Dow 9,000 - forget retirement, what about college?
Krugman points out that we're kind of in free fall ...Dow 9,000! .
I think we may have broken the 1987 % decline record for the S&P 500. If not we'll be there soon.
Now that's a bit of a drag for our retirement, but, what the heck, we'll keep doing our dollar cost averaging. If the S&P doesn't recover we're completely scr***d anyway. Maybe our investments will recover sometime in the next 20 years, because we're definitely at the grindstone until age 70.
The bigger deal is the childrens' college education.
That's closer, and the 529s are getting clobbered.
I wonder if we'll see a slowing in the incredible inflationary growth of college tuition.
I think we may have broken the 1987 % decline record for the S&P 500. If not we'll be there soon.
Now that's a bit of a drag for our retirement, but, what the heck, we'll keep doing our dollar cost averaging. If the S&P doesn't recover we're completely scr***d anyway. Maybe our investments will recover sometime in the next 20 years, because we're definitely at the grindstone until age 70.
The bigger deal is the childrens' college education.
That's closer, and the 529s are getting clobbered.
I wonder if we'll see a slowing in the incredible inflationary growth of college tuition.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)