Yesterday was about employees perspective on PAC donations.
Today is about how to purchase a 21st century American Senator.
Scott Adams is on a roll.
(Click to go to the readable original)
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Worse than 1981
I don’t remember the 1981-82 recession. I’d finished college, and I was off on a grand adventure (thank you Thomas J Watson). I returned and started medical school.
Whatever that recession was like, this one is considerably worse …
Along With Layoffs, Recession’s Cost Can Be Seen in Pay Cuts - NYTimes.com
… The Bureau of Labor Statistics does not track pay cuts, but it suggests they are reflected in the steep decline of another statistic: total weekly pay for production workers, pilots among them, representing 80 percent of the work force. That index has fallen for nine consecutive months, an unprecedented string over the 44 years the bureau has calculated weekly pay, capturing the large number of people out of work, those working fewer hours and those whose wages have been cut. The old record was a two-month decline, during the 1981-1982 recession…
Compensate Saudi Arabia for CO2 reductions?
Wow. I didn’t see this one coming….
Saudis Seek Compensation if Oil Exports Fall - NYTimes.com
Saudi Arabia is trying to enlist other oil-producing countries to support a provocative idea: if wealthy countries reduce their oil consumption to combat global warming, they should pay compensation to oil producers…
The tactic has a familial resemblance to calls for wealthy nations to compensate less industrialized nations for the economic impacts of shifting away from low cost fuels.
I doubt even the Saudis really expect direct compensation, it’s much more likely to be a negotiating maneuver.
I’ll take this one as an encouraging sign that CO2 negotiations are getting real.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
The treacherous heart of the BlackBerry
This is why carriers like the BlackBerry -- and why you won't (emphases mine)...
BlackBerry Aims to Suit Every User - NYTimes.comThe BB is very profitable for carriers, because it costs very little to produce, it comes with a mandatory data services account and a 2 year contract, and it's such a crummy net device that it makes no demands on carrier capacity.... The company has also cut the manufacturing cost of BlackBerrys by using variations on its existing designs that have allowed retailers to sell the devices at prices matching much simpler phones. For example, the BlackBerry Curve, R.I.M.’s most popular phone, is offered at Wal-Mart for about $50 with a contract. About 80 percent of R.I.M.’s sales this year have been to consumers, not to employers.
Mike Lazaridis, R.I.M’s other co-chief executive, says that the low cost of BlackBerrys allows cellular carriers to make more profit from the BlackBerrys than from other touch-screen handsets.
“We help carriers be profitable,” he said. “We gave them a way to get into the data business. Now we are giving them a way to manage their costs when they are worried that all they have to sell is highly subsidized smartphones.”
So consumers get a "free" phone that costs a bundle and delivers very little value.
Great stuff for the carriers, but eventually consumers will catch on.
Update 10/14/09: On the other hand, when AT&T moves to bandwidth adjusted pricing, the BlackBerry will be rehabilitated. It’s costs will move inline with value delivered – a productivity oriented low-bandwidth consumption platform. At that point, however, it won’t be nearly as appealing to the carriers.
When galaxies collide
This msnbc blog post has links to other spectacular Hubble images. I've downloaded them all and added them to iPhoto and my slideshow folder:
A smashing view from Hubble - Cosmic Log - msnbc.com
Long ago, a galaxy far away smashed into another galaxy - creating a beautiful, terrible knot of cosmic chaos. The view of that galactic collision, captured by the Hubble Space Telescope, serves as a preview of what might well happen when the Andromeda Galaxy slams into our Milky Way galaxy billions of years from now....
Natural selection and H1N1 immunization
Funny ...
Why the far left and the far right both oppose swine flu vaccinations. - By Christopher Beam - Slate MagazineFortunately for this vaccine campaign, few remember the Cheney/Bush smallpox fraud. That Iraq war ploy injured and killed some volunteers.
My family will be vaccinated of course. We're not seeking a Darwin award.
Downside of Rush's race baiting career
A downside to Rush's wealth creating formula. You might not be able to do business with the people you've been insulting ...
guardian.co.ukI wouldn't bet against this deal though. The NFL is as bottom line as any other megacorp.... Some players have said they would not want to play for the Rams if Limbaugh succeeds. "I don't want anything to do with a team that he has any part of," the New York Giants footballer Mathias Kiwanuka told the New York Daily News...
Nokia netbook exposes future AT&T wireless data plans
AT&T has added Nokia's Win 7 "netbook" (a $600 mini-laptop with a very slow CPU) to its lineup. The 2 year contract price is $200, but they really don't intend to sell many ...
Nokia’s Netbook Comes With Marathon Battery Life - Bits Blog - NYTimes.com
... At the event, Glenn Lurie, the president of AT&T’s emerging device unit, said he understood that a $60-a-month data plan puts the device out of the range of many potential consumers. He said that AT&T will introduce other data plans with lower prices before the end of the year, possibly including prepaid plans and those that charge users only for the days they are actually online...At $60/month AT&T is basically saying "don't buy this, you fool!". Their iPhone demolished network can't handle widespread netbook adoption.
I wonder if they had some kind of contractual launch agreement they couldn't dodge. This is really a silly launch.
The real news here, other than confirmation that Nokia is doomed, is that AT&T is going to give up on "all you can eat pricing".
That's a good thing - assuming we continue to real competition between Verizon, AT&T and Sprint/T-mobile. Flat rate pricing for a capacity constrained service is economic lunacy -- a lose-lose formula for AT&T and customers alike.
Meanwhile, we all wait for the launch of the Verizon-Google Chrome OS netbook -- the day the roof comes down.
Monday, October 12, 2009
This is why I don't do early OS X updates
Some people soar over the battlefield of life. They ride the soft thermals ... until they crash and die.
But we won't go there.
That's not me. On the field of life I'm infantry. It's ok, I've got lots of company.
So I just know that this 10.6 bug would have whacked me ...
Danger Microsoft Sidekick --log out and your data is gone. (Though it's perhaps possible to resurrect it, and everyone has backups ... Right?)
I'd disabled the Guest account on my 10.5 machine, but based on this post I didn't have too. This was fixed for 10.5. Interesting that it could also hit accounts that have no password (eg. my mother's).
But we won't go there.
That's not me. On the field of life I'm infantry. It's ok, I've got lots of company.
So I just know that this 10.6 bug would have whacked me ...
More on Snow Leopard deleting user accounts after guest login | MacFixIt - CNET Reviews
... The problem seems to happen only when guest accounts were enabled for login under Leopard before updating to Snow Leopard...It's quite a bug. It's a bit like a personal version of the
Good thing I still remember my scars from 10.4 and 10.5. So while we do use guest accounts on 10.5, we weren't affected because... we're still on 10.5.
There are some good things about 10.6. I'm looking forward to updating my MacBook around March 2010.
Apple needs to start doing open beta testing and give up on making their OS X releases great big secrets.
Update 10/13/09
Regarding the "Guest" account data loss issue, the symptoms sound very similar to those affecting Leopard users until the release of 10.5.5. Given the similarities, one might suspect the reuse of buggy code.
The 10.5 flaw actually had two facets - one is that the wrong home folder may be deleted. The other is that the same flaw permits login to non-Guest accounts without a password. See CVE-2008-3610 here:
About the security content of Mac OS X v10.5.5 and Security Update 2008-006
Description: A race condition exists in Login Window. To trigger this issue, the system must have the Guest account enabled or another account with no password. In a small proportion of attempts, an attempt to log in to such an account will not complete. The user list would then be presented again, and the person would be able to log in as any user without providing a password. If the original account were the Guest account, the contents of the new account will be deleted on logout. This update addresses the issue by properly clearing Login Window state when the login does not complete. This issue does not affect systems prior to Mac OS X v10.5.Based on reports on the web, it appears that both aspects are present in Snow Leopard, and some users claim to have established the requirements for reproducibility. I don't have Snow Leopard so unfortunately can't test things for myself, but because of the implications, will refrain from posting a link to instructions. If confirmed, the key point would be that unlike Apple's assurances that it is something that occurs only in extremely rare cases, it may well be something that is guaranteed to be triggered based on a specific sequence of events, the likelihood of which may not be so "extremely rare" depending on an individual's habits.
Regardless, since the file deletion appears to be directly tied to the resetting feature of the "Guest" account, disabling GUI login for "Guest" should prevent that aspect from being triggered, and not having any passwordless accounts enabled (including "Guest") should take care of the other
Pretty depressing if Apple restored a 10.5 bug of this magnitude in 10.6.
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Fear the Cloud: Microsoft Danger was well named
Maybe the name was intended as a warning.
Microsoft "Danger", formerly independent creators of the Sidekick Cloud-centric phone, died when they destroyed their customer's data. They haven't been buried yet, but they're an ex-Parrot.
Fear the Cloud. Fear any time you don't have full control over a useable copy of your own data, and a proven restore path.
The Sidekick was particularly vulnerable because it cached server data, it didn't maintain a full local instance. Anyone who knows synchronization is hell can sympathize with the cache approach, but the responsibility of the parent company is then immense.
Publicly traded companies don't do well with that kind of responsibility.
Glenn Feishman tells us that sync-based solutions are less vulnerable. Technically that's true -- but ActiveSync-class Push solutions can behave like a Sidekick cache. Depending on sync behavior, lost data on the server may wipe local copies. How many people can then restore an old local copy from backup? (Do you know how to do that for an iPhone? I didn't think you did.)
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
What should we look for?
We should look for a NTSB-like approach that treats Cloud data loss like an airplane crash. We need experts in error to identify the proximal cause, the 2nd cause and the 3rd cause. We need to turn each instance of data loss into a program to avoid an entire class of future disaster.
Failing that, maybe you should print reports of your key Cloud data every few weeks.
Oh, and run from Microsoft as fast as your little legs can carry you.
Update 10/12/09: As a free market alternative to an NTSB equivalent, how about we require corporations who own our data to post substantial bonds? So Microsoft would post a $5,000 bond for every Cloud customer. As long as the they don't blow it the money is theirs. Come the Dapocalypse though their customers get a reasonable pay out and Microsoft is out a few billion. that would concentrate their mind, though it would provide customers with some perverse security-testing incentives ...
White water and the end of prediction
I've indulged my pundocratic penchant for prediction over the years.
I'm more or less reformed now however.
It's not that the future is hard to predict., As Cringely recently pointed out, we know how things go. The hard part is figuring out how we get there, and when we arrive. I think that was once worth a try.
That was then. Now our times are interesting. There's too much going down, too many interacting trendlines, too much non-laminar flow. Noise and chaos.
White water times. We're in 'em, and there's no visible exit -- as long as our civilization last.
How do we adapt to white water times? We have to be loose, alert, ready to paddle fast. Keep the gear lashed down, travel light, stay tied to a survival kit and keep your mates at hand.
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Growing jobs - my old stimulus proposal
Another day, another editorial on the jobs story.
Maybe it's time to think about my old National Small Business Generation Service proposal? Especially now that health reform is looking real.
Maybe it's time to think about my old National Small Business Generation Service proposal? Especially now that health reform is looking real.
It's even old-style market-friendly GOP compatible.
Google good, AT&T and old FCC evil
It's fashionable today to disparage Google, to compare them to the Evil Empires of IBM and Microsoft, to mock the founders for faux idealism.
That's brainless fashion. My personal experience is that Google has been mostly on my side. That's why I serve the rambling House of Google rather than the shaky silver towers of Apple or the wretched slums of Microsoft.
My beef with Google is not with their alleged evil, it's been with their attention deficit disorder, the fundamental flaws of the Cloud, erratic customer abuse and the past two weeks of lousy service.
Imperfect as Google is, it's also right about the Data Freedom Front and right about saving lost books.
They're also in the right when it comes to fighting the phone fraud of "free" conferencing sites. Not that I blame AT&T for calling Google out, but the old (corrupt Bush era?) FCC was wrong about the interconnect scams (emphases and link to the Whitt post are mine) ...
FCC Is Probing Google Voice Service - WSJ.comCongress asked the FCC to look into this because they fear "for rural customers".
.... Richard Whitt, Google's Washington telecom and media counsel, said in a blog post Friday that Google restricts calls to certain local phone numbers because "they charge exorbitant termination rates" and "partner with adult sex chat lines and 'free' conference calling centers to drive high volumes of traffic."
AT&T Inc. has said Google is violating rules designed to ensure that phone companies connect all calls. Earlier this week, a group of lawmakers asked the FCC for an investigation into the matter, saying the practice could hurt rural customers...
...The FCC rebuked AT&T and other carriers several years ago for blocking calls with high-access charges, saying common-carrier telephone companies can't pick and choose which numbers they will patch through and which they will block.
Bullpoop. They fear the loss of campaign donations and future jobs from parasitic RBOCs now living off interconnect scam leavings.
It's tough for the FCC to stand up to corrupt lawmakers, but this is the Obama era. I'm cautiously optimistic. If Google was accepting donations I'd send 'em money, but for now I'll just write a note of support to my representative. (While I'm at it, I'll ask her to look into the cramming scams and the unblockable receiver-pays SMS scam. Bush/Cheney left the Obama-era FCC with a lot a of poop to shovel.)
Friday, October 09, 2009
The file could not be found: The Decline of OS X
I browse to a file in OS X and try to open it. The app respond "the file could not be found".
I can copy it in the Finder though.
It's all of a piece with the long decline of OS X. As I wrote in 2007
Gordon's Tech: The dumbing down of OS X (and Vista): indirection is too hardSince then OS X Snow Leopard has regressed to the metadata standards of DOS 2.1. Anyone else notice that shortcuts to files stored on OS X servers no longer work? They used to mount the share and open the file, now you have to mount the server yourself.
Snow Leopard is supposed to be a cleaner, better version of OS X -- but it's had a typically rocky start. Apple's core OS is still in decline.
In retrospect, OS X went to the dark side after Tevanian left.
It's depressing - I don't see any light at the end of this tunnel.
Update 10/10/09: I ask on Apple Discussions for a stress test of OS X networking. Did 10.6 fix anything?
Update 10/10/09b: There's a report that this DOES work in 10.6. I'd given up hope. Now I don't need to think about Windows 7.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)